Fifty print and video items of gay and straight “adult” nature have been ruled admissable by Judge Rodney Melville in the case against Michael Jackson. One of the items includes fingerprints of both Jackson and his young accuser. The porno stash purportedly also contains “adult” images of models who may be 18, but appear much younger, the prosecutor said.
The judge has forbidden the prosecution from calling the seized items pornography, erotic, or obscene; instead the judge has instructed the prosecution to refer to the items as “adult” or “sexually explicit.”
I’m just trying to imagine what an “adult, sexually explicit” image would be if it wasn’t also pornographic or erotic. Any takers? Perhaps Black’s Law should be consulted. They always have such great illustrations.
